Senate Parliamentarian Rejects Trump's Ballroom Funding - NOTUS
Republicans say they will try to revise proposal to include the Trump priority in their budget bill.
www.notus.orgDemocrats announced that the Senate's top parliamentary referee determined the $1 billion ballroom funding did not meet budget rules. Sources indicate the ruling may force changes or a 60-vote threshold. GOP aides indicated efforts to rework the plan post-ruling. A trio of aides indicated an alternate path is needed to authorize the ballroom construction. Democrats cast the ruling as a setback for the Trump agenda. Supporters noted the ruling clarifies budget-rule boundaries. The decision circulated Saturday night among lawmakers and staff. Observers caution that the path ahead is uncertain without revisions. Party leaders pursued a path to keep the plan alive while respecting rules.
Republicans say they will try to revise proposal to include the Trump priority in their budget bill.
www.notus.orgDemocrats quickly cast the ruling as a defeat for Trump and his administration. Senate Republicans had been seeking $1 billion in taxpayer money for Secret Service security upgrades, including the ballroom, and planned to fold the measure into a massive spending package that is mainly devoted to immigration enforcement. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority, but most legislation still needs 60 votes to pass in the Senate, which gives the parliamentarian’s ruling immediate weight. … MacDonough’s...
www.mogazmasr.comA proposal to fund $1 billion in security additions for the White House campus and the president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural rules KCBS All News 106.9FM and 740AM
www.audacy.comThree congressional aides say lawmakers will need to find another way to authorize construction of the White House ballroom after the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
www.politico.comDemocrats announced Saturday night that the Senate's top parliamentary referee had determined that the $1 billion provision did not comply with budget rules.
www.nytimes.com